Those Textbooks…

It’s pretty much the last week of July. Fall semester starts up August 14th, and, if you’ve ever seen the movie Grease, this is the part where Danny Zuko and Sandy are running in the surf, holding hands, and looking at each other, longingly, wondering, will they ever see each other again?

Well, if you’re imagining the same scene with your Calculus textbook from this summer (not), then fret not: you CAN see it again! Thanks to the wonders of the Circulation Department, the Textbook Lending Library will be available to you again for your textbooks this fall semester! Yay! No awkward reunions!

The procedure is a little different this time around, so read THIS. And then do a little karaoke of “Summer Nights”…



Leave a comment

Filed under Lending Library, Library Resources, Summer

Information Going *Poof?

Many people depend on websites hosted by the U.S. Federal Government. Whether someone is looking up information on cancer using MedlinePlus, trying to find out how much money can be made as a physical therapist, or simply wanting to check out a Federal tax form, websites in the .gov domain are invaluable.

We like to think that this information will always be available for us to access, that more and more information is being added all the time. However, that is not the case as of late: the Trump administration has been engaged in removing information from government websites, instead of adding information.

Some of the information that has been removed includes:

While some information can be found on an archived version of the White House website as it was under Barack Obama, what’s available doesn’t measure up to the past configuration of the Federal websites. This is why organizations such as the Library of Congress, the Internet Archive, California Digital Library, and scores of others, are collaborating to archive as much information from the government websites as possible.

One of the problems with information on the Internet is that it can easily be changed or deleted. While it’s not surprising that Wikipedia entries on certain people have been edited, information available via the government has more import. We need to think about how historical Internet information can be preserved in this era of electronic information. The organizations involved in saving information from the government websites are modeling efforts that could potentially be useful. But we need to remember that online information is ephemeral.


Leave a comment

Filed under Donal Trump, environment, federal government, Freedom of Speech, intellectual freedom, LGBTQ, spanish language

Vanity Projects?

Maybe it was a trick instead of a treat?

On 31 October, 2016, Greta Von Susteren sent out the following tweet on Twitter:

Considering the legion of librarians and library patrons on Twitter, this tweet provoked quite a response. Some responded that the digital divide (in which some people have ready access to computers and technology, while others have little access to technology, due to finances, and the only computers they have access to, besides those in the library, are their smartphones) makes libraries indispensable. Others noted that the changes in teaching modes and tools could require a new building, as that picturesque library building built in 1910 doesn’t have the wiring, much less the outlets, for 65 new desktop computers. The president of the American Library Association noted that librarians are trained to be able to discern information from knowledge, something which Google cannot. And, of course, there were comments on the fact that not everything is online, that libraries were less “vanity projects” and more “centers for collaboration, study, and research.”

Von Susteren feels that the increase in college tuition and student debt is due to the construction on buildings such as libraries. Yet some pointed out that the culprits were more likely administrative bloat and athletics. (Interested in seeing the highest-paid public employees in each state? I can guarantee you that they aren’t librarians.)

While it’s laudable that Von Susteren is concerned about the high price of college, she is chasing after the wrong culprit. Libraries, and libraries that are well-equipped and meet recommended standards play a great role in helping to create the kind of citizens that everyone can be proud of. It’s a little hard to do that on an IBM386 with a 1200 baud modem buzzing in the background while students read encyclopedias from the 1950’s or, worse, gather information from a Wikipedia entry that was just “edited” by a spiteful ex-spouse.

Back to the drawing board, Ms. Von Susteren.

(Credit to for many of the details)

Leave a comment

Filed under Freedom of Speech, Greta Van Susteren, librarians, Libraries, Library Resources, Twitter, vanity projects

Another “hysteric” librarian for freedom

Back in 2001, right after the 9/11 attacks, the federal government enacted a piece of legislation called the USA PATRIOT ACT (which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism). This legislation essentially gave federal agents and law officers powers they had never had before, to use in the fight against terrorism.

Unfortunately, one of the features of the USA PATRIOT ACT was that libraries and library files could be subject to searches — an officer could demand to know who had checked out the Quran or The Anarchist’s Cookbook, and the library would have to release that information. Worse, the library could not even let patrons know that their private check-out records had been violated.

Librarians are often thought of a quiet bunch, collecting cats and hats and rare copies of The Cat in the Hat. But when it comes to intellectual freedom? Woo-whee, we get all roused up. In 2003, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft accused librarians of stirring up “baseless hysteria” in reaction to the controversial Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which allowed for the confiscation of library records. But, it’s happened — our fears were not baseless.

Librarians will go to great lengths to protect intellectual freedom. It recently came to light that a librarian in Kansas City, Missouri, was arrested during a public event because he was trying to defend a patron’s right to free speech.

The Kansas City Public Library, no stranger to controversial speakers, had in May 2016 invited Dennis Ross, former advisor on the Middle East to Presidents George H.W. Bush and Barack Obama, to speak on the topics of Israel and President Truman. Three off-duty police officers and the head of security for the Jewish Community Foundation were asked to serve as security for the event. Security’s job was not to prevent guests from asking controversial questions, but rather eject patrons only after consulting with library officials.

Well, things went wrong. Jeremy Rothe-Kushel, a local activist, asked a question about what he considered to be the US’s support of Israel’s “state-sponsored terrorism.” This question was answered calmly. But Rothe-Kushel’s next question was more aggressive, and at this point, security, under the impression that the library was a private building, came up to him to immediately kick him out. Steve Woolfolk, the library’s director of programming, stepped in to defend Rothe-Kushel’s right to remain in a public building and participate in a public forum. Rather than stay, however, Rothe-Kushel said that he would leave if asked to. Woolfolk walked out with him, the two of them led out by security. Then, suddenly, several guards grabbed Woolfolk, kicking him in the knee, slamming him against a pillar and finally flinging down into a chair, where he was eventually handcuffed. Both men were arrested; Woolfolk was charged with interfering with an arrest. Both cases have yet to be resolved.

Intellectual freedom is important. It is what allows us to learn and grown as humans, to nurture and develop thoughts and ideas that may, at some point, evolve into something else entirely. Intellectual freedom is what lets us read about evolution AND creationism, Catholicism AND Paganism, Capitalism AND Marxism. It’s what lets the confused 18-year-old read about homosexuality, the hurting 40-year-old learn about adult children of alcoholics, the grieving 76-year-old suggest hospice for a dying loved one.

You may not always agree with what you read in the library. But know that librarians will fight for your right to read.

Leave a comment

Filed under Arrests, Freedom of Speech, Hysterical Librarians, intellectual freedom, John Ashcroft, legal, USA Patriot Act

Rumble in the Jungle… of LibraryLand?

Welcome back, intrepid readers, writers, and researchers. It’s a brand new school year, and we embrace it with new… prejudice?


Shocked Tuxedo Cat is Shocked

Let us explain:

There is a publication called VOYA: Voice of Youth Advocates that is widely read by those who pick out books for young adult readers (the term “young adult” officially refers to readers ages 12-18, but there is nothing keeping a 30-year-old from reading Rainbow Rowell’s Fangirl). On September 22, 2016, VOYA published a review of the book Run by Kody Keplinger. The reviewer, Rachel Axelrod, stated this about the book: “The story contains many references to Bo being bisexual and an abundance of bad language, so it is recommended for mature junior and senior high readers.” (And all this during Bisexual Awareness Week.)

Many people online, librarians as well as bloggers, were upset by this line. Even the author of the book was upset. After all, the sex between straight characters had not been called out for being for “mature” readers. In response to VOYA‘s review, Tristina Wright, herself an author, sent an email to the editor in chief, expressing her concern about the review. Wright is not only bisexual herself, but also the mother of a genderqueer daughter. She was concerned that not only would readers see bisexuality as “something to be warned against,” as well as something only for the consideration of “mature” readers. The editor in chief, Rose Mary Ludt, responded, in part:

Our writers and reviewers have various lifestyles and beliefs and that has never been a concern of mine and usually not even revealed to me unless the writer chooses to do so, so the assumption that I or VOYA magazine might be bi- or any other kind of phobic is just that, your assumption. A misguided one.

Since this is Bi Visibility Week, I understand your need to find and destroy your enemies in a public forum, however, VOYA magazine and I are not your enemies.

Thank you for reading VOYA magazine.

While Wright shared this email with all names blacked out, VOYA had no problems with posting the exchange on their website with all names visible. The magazine did, however, go back later and delete the post.

As you might imagine, hilarity ensued. Or not. Many people, LGBTQ+ people as well as allies, complained to VOYA. VOYA published non-apology after another on their Facebook page, then going back to delete the non-apology posts, comments included, as well as blocking several people from replying to them on Twitter.

Things got so bad that the folks at SorryWatch had to step in:

…Saying “our writers and reviewers have various lifestyles” is like saying “some of my best friends are Black.” DO NOT. (Also, “lifestyles”? Ironic PBR-drinking-and-mustache-cultivation is a lifestyle. Being bisexual is a life, integral to someone’s sense of self.) Finally, the parting shot about “your need to find and destroy your enemies” is just WHACKADOODLE. ( even gave VOYA a free apology that they could use to defuse the situation. They declined the kind offer. And the situation continued to spiral downward, to the point where all sorts of websites and media are commenting on what was going on:

It remains to be seen how this debacle will continue to affect VOYA; several librarians have declared online that they have not only lost respect for VOYA, but will also no longer use the magazine for book-buying purposes. One reviewer quit as soon as things started going south. A reputable literary agent stated that he would pull his ads from the magazine and encourage others to do the same.

Now what, VOYA?

Leave a comment

Filed under Books, Discrimination, LGBTQ, Prejudice

Captain America: Civil War

So, “Captain America: Civil War” is due to come out in April. Some of you who are keenly interested in the Marvel Comics universe may be quite anxious for this movie to come out. Others may be wondering, “What’s the big whoop?”

The movie is based on a short run of Marvel comics called (you guessed it) “Civil War.” A superhero battle resulting in collateral damage makes the government wonder whether superheroes and mutants should register with the government in an effort to track and control them. This pending legislation pits hero against hero, as this question is raised: what is worth more, safety or freedom of privacy?

This argument is not unlike that which faces the United States on a regular basis. The bombings of 9/11 brought forth a flurry of legislation, intended to keep us safe, yet many felt that we were giving up our freedoms, that which made the United States unique, in the face of fear. The USA PATRIOT Act directly interferes with many of the beliefs that librarians hold dear. For example, we don’t believe in letting others know what books you’ve been checking out, or what you’ve been doing on the public computers. Yet the USA PATRIOT Act dictates that that information be made public, if necessary. I’m sure you can see the conflict here, and how it relates to Captain America.

We’re not asking you to think of libraries when you see this movie (well, librarians will, probably — that’s just the way our minds work). But definitely consider the different arguments that Iron Man and Captain America represent. Safety or freedom? (Oh, and another couple of questions: Tony Stark or Steve Rogers? Black Widow or Scarlet Witch?)

Leave a comment

Filed under Books, intellectual freedom, legal, Libraries, super heroes

Comics and Cosplay!

Hey, we’re back! And with news of a fun event being hosted by the E.P. Foster Library, part of the Ventura County Library System.

Foster Con 2016 is the 3rd such event hosted by the library. Foster Con happens on Saturday, February 27th, from 10am to 4pm. Comics, anime, and games vendors will be there to help you out with your geek needs. There will even be people dressed up like characters from the original Star Wars trilogy — come and get your picture taken with them!

Of course, events like this are generally more fun if you’re dressed like Deadpool or your favorite Firefly character, so go ahead and bust out the cosplay outfits!

WHAT: Foster Con 2016

WHEN: Saturday, February 27th, 10am to 4pm

WHERE: E.P. Foster Library, 651 East Main Street, Ventura, CA 93001

For more information:

Leave a comment

Filed under Event, Local